<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Intelligent Design Exposed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://idexposed.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://idexposed.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Where the scientific vacuity of Intelligent Design is exposed from a Christian perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 05:38:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Robert Hazen: Origin of Life 101 by mayank tripathi</title>
		<link>http://idexposed.wordpress.com/2008/05/14/robert-hazen-origin-of-life-101/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>mayank tripathi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 05:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idexposed.wordpress.com/?p=26#comment-184</guid>
		<description>ok for it&#039;s knowaldge</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok for it&#8217;s knowaldge</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Plants that defy evolution:  Datura stramonium (Jimson Weed) by Flupempoone</title>
		<link>http://idexposed.wordpress.com/2008/05/11/plants-that-defy-evolution-datura-stramonium-jimson-weed/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>Flupempoone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 18:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idexposed.wordpress.com/?p=28#comment-183</guid>
		<description>Atlantic Urban district casinos comprise fit so immobilize to receiving their takings figures each month, that the get ready does not bring precisely the joy that it used to. Quest of September, however, the casinos can require at least a small victory.

In support of the to begin days in diverse months, the net income up from joke year to the next in month during month figures was less than false digits. In September, returns at the casinos was down 5.8%. Four of the eleven casinos set practised an heighten in revenue.

&quot;I expectation we&#039;re seeing signs that things are starting to stabilize,&quot; said Mark Juliano, CEO of Trump Sport Resorts, as reported by The Associated Crowd, &quot;It may be the double-digit (declines) might be behind us. The earnest question is how great until we get go to the results we slogan in history years, which is the debatable every one in the affair has.&quot;

Literally, many in the toil are wondering if Atlantic Bishopric casinos resolution ever foresee the relish they in the good old days experienced. Tournament in the Northeast is becoming brutish, and people no longer sire to peregrinations to AC to do their gambling.

Connecticut and Stylish York have planned both expanded casino gambling options in the interest their residents. Pennsylvania has also opened late casinos, and record games representing Pennsylvania casinos may not be incomparably very much potty, with lawmakers already talking almost table deception expansion.

Atlantic Urban district casinos, nonetheless, resolve acknowledge minor victories if they are a means to an object in place of an unsightly year and a half importance of revenue figures. The twin digit declines would rather been adding up, and very many casinos bear already gone into bankruptcy in the city.

In search September, AC casinos won $335.4 million. That is down almost six percent from form year, but account the sixteen percent drop in gate in August, September figures do not look that bad.
variant2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Atlantic Urban district casinos comprise fit so immobilize to receiving their takings figures each month, that the get ready does not bring precisely the joy that it used to. Quest of September, however, the casinos can require at least a small victory.</p>
<p>In support of the to begin days in diverse months, the net income up from joke year to the next in month during month figures was less than false digits. In September, returns at the casinos was down 5.8%. Four of the eleven casinos set practised an heighten in revenue.</p>
<p>&#8220;I expectation we&#8217;re seeing signs that things are starting to stabilize,&#8221; said Mark Juliano, CEO of Trump Sport Resorts, as reported by The Associated Crowd, &#8220;It may be the double-digit (declines) might be behind us. The earnest question is how great until we get go to the results we slogan in history years, which is the debatable every one in the affair has.&#8221;</p>
<p>Literally, many in the toil are wondering if Atlantic Bishopric casinos resolution ever foresee the relish they in the good old days experienced. Tournament in the Northeast is becoming brutish, and people no longer sire to peregrinations to AC to do their gambling.</p>
<p>Connecticut and Stylish York have planned both expanded casino gambling options in the interest their residents. Pennsylvania has also opened late casinos, and record games representing Pennsylvania casinos may not be incomparably very much potty, with lawmakers already talking almost table deception expansion.</p>
<p>Atlantic Urban district casinos, nonetheless, resolve acknowledge minor victories if they are a means to an object in place of an unsightly year and a half importance of revenue figures. The twin digit declines would rather been adding up, and very many casinos bear already gone into bankruptcy in the city.</p>
<p>In search September, AC casinos won $335.4 million. That is down almost six percent from form year, but account the sixteen percent drop in gate in August, September figures do not look that bad.<br />
variant2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on United Methodist Church: Evolution and Intelligent Design by K12SQUARED</title>
		<link>http://idexposed.wordpress.com/2008/05/19/united-methodist-church-evolution-and-intelligent-design/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>K12SQUARED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 13:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idexposed.wordpress.com/?p=54#comment-182</guid>
		<description>To those who question ID, or creationism.  I am not a scientist.  I am not a theologan.  What I am is a servant of God, and His kingdom.  Your Greek knowledge of the sciences is truely aspirational, but know this, regardless what you may believe to be true or applicable to the sciences, it can be refuted by a creation scientist, and in most respects have a more viable explanation than the humanist.  Also, keep in mind, the world which we now live will be destroyed with a fervant heat, and will be created again.  Therefore, all your current scientific accomplishments will have to be relearned.  God makes fools of all humanists, and the second coming of His Son will be the ultimate mockery of all those who have persecuted Him.

My point is this.  Don&#039;t judge a believer for what he believes, for in the same way, God will judge you at the consumation.  From what I do know about a cell, is that it is made of too many mechanical processes to ever have evolved from chemical soup.  The DNA alone screams of ID, and is the testimony of the creation power of all mighty God.  The truth of this matter is that both Creationism and Evolution are BOTH religions.  Both are based on a theory.  One that God creates, and the other of presumption created by secular man.  One theory is painted through Spirit inspired scripture, while the other determined by circumstantial evidence that changes from one study to another.  One theory isn&#039;t allowed to change, even though there are many within the church who try.  The other is changed daily to support a certain scientists findings.  Creation proclaims boldly in a God who will judge humanity, and humanistic evolution screams for the sensorship of God, making man god instead.

Friends, you are fully capable of making your minds up on this matter.  If you want to believe in evolution, then by all means believe.  However, all I ask, is that allow both sides of the argument to be portraited by intellectuals.  Again, I am neither a scientist or preacher.  I am a follower of Christ Jesus, and believe in whatever He says... not man.  So your arguments will not sway me for I know the Truth.  As for bacterial flagella, let me ask you this.  What came first, the tail or the cell?

Peace be with you my friends</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To those who question ID, or creationism.  I am not a scientist.  I am not a theologan.  What I am is a servant of God, and His kingdom.  Your Greek knowledge of the sciences is truely aspirational, but know this, regardless what you may believe to be true or applicable to the sciences, it can be refuted by a creation scientist, and in most respects have a more viable explanation than the humanist.  Also, keep in mind, the world which we now live will be destroyed with a fervant heat, and will be created again.  Therefore, all your current scientific accomplishments will have to be relearned.  God makes fools of all humanists, and the second coming of His Son will be the ultimate mockery of all those who have persecuted Him.</p>
<p>My point is this.  Don&#8217;t judge a believer for what he believes, for in the same way, God will judge you at the consumation.  From what I do know about a cell, is that it is made of too many mechanical processes to ever have evolved from chemical soup.  The DNA alone screams of ID, and is the testimony of the creation power of all mighty God.  The truth of this matter is that both Creationism and Evolution are BOTH religions.  Both are based on a theory.  One that God creates, and the other of presumption created by secular man.  One theory is painted through Spirit inspired scripture, while the other determined by circumstantial evidence that changes from one study to another.  One theory isn&#8217;t allowed to change, even though there are many within the church who try.  The other is changed daily to support a certain scientists findings.  Creation proclaims boldly in a God who will judge humanity, and humanistic evolution screams for the sensorship of God, making man god instead.</p>
<p>Friends, you are fully capable of making your minds up on this matter.  If you want to believe in evolution, then by all means believe.  However, all I ask, is that allow both sides of the argument to be portraited by intellectuals.  Again, I am neither a scientist or preacher.  I am a follower of Christ Jesus, and believe in whatever He says&#8230; not man.  So your arguments will not sway me for I know the Truth.  As for bacterial flagella, let me ask you this.  What came first, the tail or the cell?</p>
<p>Peace be with you my friends</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Robert Hazen: Origin of Life 101 by Keith Farnham</title>
		<link>http://idexposed.wordpress.com/2008/05/14/robert-hazen-origin-of-life-101/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Farnham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 01:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idexposed.wordpress.com/?p=26#comment-181</guid>
		<description>Greater men than Mr. Hazen have been intellectually dismantled at their attempts to prove a &quot;scientific&quot; basis for reality. Both Newton and Einstein are now converts to Creationismas.... Alas, too late for their benefit.

Expecting the creation to explain the Creator is folly. 

2 Corinthians 4:3,4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greater men than Mr. Hazen have been intellectually dismantled at their attempts to prove a &#8220;scientific&#8221; basis for reality. Both Newton and Einstein are now converts to Creationismas&#8230;. Alas, too late for their benefit.</p>
<p>Expecting the creation to explain the Creator is folly. </p>
<p>2 Corinthians 4:3,4</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Robert Hazen: Origin of Life 101 by neda</title>
		<link>http://idexposed.wordpress.com/2008/05/14/robert-hazen-origin-of-life-101/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>neda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 06:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idexposed.wordpress.com/?p=26#comment-180</guid>
		<description>hi mr hazean 
im  really intrested to find the text of your lecture whichi sabout the scientific method track 2 if you send the its text to me it can be so helpfull for me becuse iam not a native speaker so i couldent understand the whole your lecture  but im really intrested know more about this specific scientific method .
thank you very much for your excelet lectures i look forward your answer 
sincerly ,
neda</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi mr hazean<br />
im  really intrested to find the text of your lecture whichi sabout the scientific method track 2 if you send the its text to me it can be so helpfull for me becuse iam not a native speaker so i couldent understand the whole your lecture  but im really intrested know more about this specific scientific method .<br />
thank you very much for your excelet lectures i look forward your answer<br />
sincerly ,<br />
neda</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Plants that defy evolution:  Datura stramonium (Jimson Weed) by Joseph Alden</title>
		<link>http://idexposed.wordpress.com/2008/05/11/plants-that-defy-evolution-datura-stramonium-jimson-weed/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Alden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idexposed.wordpress.com/?p=28#comment-179</guid>
		<description>Once again, we have yet another evos - inbred, aka Dom, sharing with us, even more worthless psycho - babble.  It&#039;s not even a valid response, but merely another darwinian rant. Dom is easily exposed as both a fraud and a liar, since dear Dom begins by stating that &quot; only the first paragraph was read and the rest was skipped, blah, blah, blah.&quot;  Funny how Dom then proceeded to comment on issues beyond just the &quot; first paragraph.&quot;  What a fraud.

Let us quickly summarize the original intent of this topic.  I&#039;ll keep it simple, for all of the Lord Charles simpletons in evo-land. Please pay attention this time. That includes you Pim. 

The original debate was over thorns. The whys and hows of their existence in nature.  An example was presented;  Datura stramonium, commonly known as jimsonweed. IDers claim the thorns serve a distinct purpose. They encase a pod of toxic seeds. Evos in-breds contradict themselves, as usual, first by claiming they are merely the result of random, genetic mutations, that occurred over millions of years, with no purpose, mind you, to then claiming the thorns might also SERVE a purpose, in latching onto animal fur, for seed propagation, etc. etc.  They love to have it both ways, in order to prevent their reasoning from becoming exposed as idiots - logic.  Sorry, but you evos make this lame attempt on a daily basis.  Let us therefore, once again, expose their nonsensical science - fiction. 

Dom says &quot; the thorns are a first line of defense.  Animals don&#039;t know the seeds are poisonous, hence the menacing appearance of thorns as a warning, blah, blah, blah.&quot;  You missed the point entirely.  That&#039;s not even the argument. The original discussion was this :  How does the PLANT know its seeds are lethal to being with ?  Forget the animals looming about. That comes later. The relevant question is WHY ! Why do the thorns even exist in the first place ?  The plant cannot have established this defense mechanism for itself, over millions of years, by random chance. It can&#039;t. It&#039;s a PLANT. It has no brain, no subjective thought process, no deductive reasoning ability. It does not KNOW of the toxic nature of its seed content.  Dom then goes on to rant about how the thorns &quot; could be &quot; beneficial by latching onto an animal, etc. Wrong again Dom. The seed pod of the Datura stramonium is secured to the stem quite well. It is extremely difficult to remove. Therefore your seed propagation argument is thereby reduced to yet another example of mindless dribble. 

Dom then spews the tired, worn out excuse of how the &quot; seeds don&#039;t have to have been given life by a Creator, it&#039;s just a simple case of water and the seeds and a chemical reaction and then SHAZAM, the seed is revitalized.&quot;  Strike three, Dom !  How did the SEED come into existence in the first place, with its entire genetic code intact, containing all the specific details, on how the plant is to grow, to mature, to engage in photosynthesis, and then develop a way of reproduction for the next generation ?   This cannot have all come about by simple, genetic mutations, occurring over time.  No amount of time allows for this complex, structured plant species to exist, WITHOUT there being an original, Intelligent Designer. 

Finally, Dom commits the ultimate act of self- inflicted,  mental coup de grace.  Dom says &quot; what is so structured about a venus flytrap ? &quot;  Well, how about first exposing that minor, little inconvenience, you dismiss as a &quot; moving mechanism &quot; which allows it to catch &amp; then digest bugs ?   The Dionaea muscipula is one of my favorite examples of Intelligent Design.  The complex construction of that simple moving mechanism, is still debated by the scientific community to this day.  Back in 2005, it was suggested by evos inbreds, that the mystery had been solved.  Wrong.  A collection of moronic fools simply restated the  detailed, step by step process. They tried to claim how the elastic pressure is easily created on the surface of the leaves, etc. etc.  And yet, they never solved anything.  Their own report summary states &quot; ..... however, the exact mechanism the flytrap uses to change the pressure within the leaves, remains unknown.&quot;  Really ? SO, we have not solved the riddle after all, have we !  Exactly. We still do not know HOW it works. It CANNOT have developed all of the complex mechanisms for itself, simply over time. It&#039;s a PLANT. It has no brain, no central nervous system, no muscles, no tendons, no ligaments, nothing that can be readily understood by mankind. 

Like thorns in nature, the complexity of the Venus Flytrap denotes and reveals the work of an Intelligent Designer. This Creator is beyond our total human understanding. Thus the validity &amp; need for scientific research itself. The constant and collective quest, to discover and explore and define, how all species, both plant and animal, exist throughout our vast universe.  Once again, Intelligent Design has thus been validated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, we have yet another evos &#8211; inbred, aka Dom, sharing with us, even more worthless psycho &#8211; babble.  It&#8217;s not even a valid response, but merely another darwinian rant. Dom is easily exposed as both a fraud and a liar, since dear Dom begins by stating that &#8221; only the first paragraph was read and the rest was skipped, blah, blah, blah.&#8221;  Funny how Dom then proceeded to comment on issues beyond just the &#8221; first paragraph.&#8221;  What a fraud.</p>
<p>Let us quickly summarize the original intent of this topic.  I&#8217;ll keep it simple, for all of the Lord Charles simpletons in evo-land. Please pay attention this time. That includes you Pim. </p>
<p>The original debate was over thorns. The whys and hows of their existence in nature.  An example was presented;  Datura stramonium, commonly known as jimsonweed. IDers claim the thorns serve a distinct purpose. They encase a pod of toxic seeds. Evos in-breds contradict themselves, as usual, first by claiming they are merely the result of random, genetic mutations, that occurred over millions of years, with no purpose, mind you, to then claiming the thorns might also SERVE a purpose, in latching onto animal fur, for seed propagation, etc. etc.  They love to have it both ways, in order to prevent their reasoning from becoming exposed as idiots &#8211; logic.  Sorry, but you evos make this lame attempt on a daily basis.  Let us therefore, once again, expose their nonsensical science &#8211; fiction. </p>
<p>Dom says &#8221; the thorns are a first line of defense.  Animals don&#8217;t know the seeds are poisonous, hence the menacing appearance of thorns as a warning, blah, blah, blah.&#8221;  You missed the point entirely.  That&#8217;s not even the argument. The original discussion was this :  How does the PLANT know its seeds are lethal to being with ?  Forget the animals looming about. That comes later. The relevant question is WHY ! Why do the thorns even exist in the first place ?  The plant cannot have established this defense mechanism for itself, over millions of years, by random chance. It can&#8217;t. It&#8217;s a PLANT. It has no brain, no subjective thought process, no deductive reasoning ability. It does not KNOW of the toxic nature of its seed content.  Dom then goes on to rant about how the thorns &#8221; could be &#8221; beneficial by latching onto an animal, etc. Wrong again Dom. The seed pod of the Datura stramonium is secured to the stem quite well. It is extremely difficult to remove. Therefore your seed propagation argument is thereby reduced to yet another example of mindless dribble. </p>
<p>Dom then spews the tired, worn out excuse of how the &#8221; seeds don&#8217;t have to have been given life by a Creator, it&#8217;s just a simple case of water and the seeds and a chemical reaction and then SHAZAM, the seed is revitalized.&#8221;  Strike three, Dom !  How did the SEED come into existence in the first place, with its entire genetic code intact, containing all the specific details, on how the plant is to grow, to mature, to engage in photosynthesis, and then develop a way of reproduction for the next generation ?   This cannot have all come about by simple, genetic mutations, occurring over time.  No amount of time allows for this complex, structured plant species to exist, WITHOUT there being an original, Intelligent Designer. </p>
<p>Finally, Dom commits the ultimate act of self- inflicted,  mental coup de grace.  Dom says &#8221; what is so structured about a venus flytrap ? &#8221;  Well, how about first exposing that minor, little inconvenience, you dismiss as a &#8221; moving mechanism &#8221; which allows it to catch &amp; then digest bugs ?   The Dionaea muscipula is one of my favorite examples of Intelligent Design.  The complex construction of that simple moving mechanism, is still debated by the scientific community to this day.  Back in 2005, it was suggested by evos inbreds, that the mystery had been solved.  Wrong.  A collection of moronic fools simply restated the  detailed, step by step process. They tried to claim how the elastic pressure is easily created on the surface of the leaves, etc. etc.  And yet, they never solved anything.  Their own report summary states &#8221; &#8230;.. however, the exact mechanism the flytrap uses to change the pressure within the leaves, remains unknown.&#8221;  Really ? SO, we have not solved the riddle after all, have we !  Exactly. We still do not know HOW it works. It CANNOT have developed all of the complex mechanisms for itself, simply over time. It&#8217;s a PLANT. It has no brain, no central nervous system, no muscles, no tendons, no ligaments, nothing that can be readily understood by mankind. </p>
<p>Like thorns in nature, the complexity of the Venus Flytrap denotes and reveals the work of an Intelligent Designer. This Creator is beyond our total human understanding. Thus the validity &amp; need for scientific research itself. The constant and collective quest, to discover and explore and define, how all species, both plant and animal, exist throughout our vast universe.  Once again, Intelligent Design has thus been validated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Plants that defy evolution:  Datura stramonium (Jimson Weed) by Dom</title>
		<link>http://idexposed.wordpress.com/2008/05/11/plants-that-defy-evolution-datura-stramonium-jimson-weed/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Dom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 11:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idexposed.wordpress.com/?p=28#comment-178</guid>
		<description>&quot;Structured order equals Intelligent Design.&quot;

no the illusion of structured order in cells is mitosis in action.  there is no &quot;need&quot; for structured order.  that is a human trait.  that things have to be in order as we are to be real.  the vast biodiversity of earth can show that there is not much structured order involved.  just individual species that branch off in the quest for survival.  what is so structured about a venus fly trap?  a leaf that evolved into a moving mechanism that can digest a bug?   Intelligent Design theory is that something is so complex that it had to have been made by something.  but you can use the same logic to say how can something have such divine power to create such a complex state of matter that has a will of its own?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Structured order equals Intelligent Design.&#8221;</p>
<p>no the illusion of structured order in cells is mitosis in action.  there is no &#8220;need&#8221; for structured order.  that is a human trait.  that things have to be in order as we are to be real.  the vast biodiversity of earth can show that there is not much structured order involved.  just individual species that branch off in the quest for survival.  what is so structured about a venus fly trap?  a leaf that evolved into a moving mechanism that can digest a bug?   Intelligent Design theory is that something is so complex that it had to have been made by something.  but you can use the same logic to say how can something have such divine power to create such a complex state of matter that has a will of its own?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Plants that defy evolution:  Datura stramonium (Jimson Weed) by Dom</title>
		<link>http://idexposed.wordpress.com/2008/05/11/plants-that-defy-evolution-datura-stramonium-jimson-weed/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Dom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 10:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idexposed.wordpress.com/?p=28#comment-177</guid>
		<description>very many plants contain alkaloids.  every datura species contains the alkaloids scopolamine hyoscamine and atropine.  the alkaloid content varies in every plant.  you could have one plant that has more in its seeds or its leaves.  the biggest factor in that variety is the ENVIROMENT.  I have literally proven this with my own experimentation and research.  in most plants such as peruvian torch cacti if you treat the plant to less than ideal conditions you can raise its alkaloid content.  everything in plants is about adaption.  if there is a draught more flowers are produced for seed.  seeds can survive much harsher conditions than a plant.  seeing as the biggest thing that separates christianity from the rest is that jesus was ressurected (sorry i didn&#039;t want to refer to any religion in general I wanted to just argue against intelligent design.)  wouldn&#039;t a plant with its ability to die back in winter be compared?  There have been seeds that have been germinated that were sitting in a museum for 100 years.  seeds don&#039;t have to be given life by a creator.  once H2O reaches the embreyo inside a chemical reaction occurs and a seed is revitalized.  if any of that isn&#039;t adaption than define adaption for me one more time</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very many plants contain alkaloids.  every datura species contains the alkaloids scopolamine hyoscamine and atropine.  the alkaloid content varies in every plant.  you could have one plant that has more in its seeds or its leaves.  the biggest factor in that variety is the ENVIROMENT.  I have literally proven this with my own experimentation and research.  in most plants such as peruvian torch cacti if you treat the plant to less than ideal conditions you can raise its alkaloid content.  everything in plants is about adaption.  if there is a draught more flowers are produced for seed.  seeds can survive much harsher conditions than a plant.  seeing as the biggest thing that separates christianity from the rest is that jesus was ressurected (sorry i didn&#8217;t want to refer to any religion in general I wanted to just argue against intelligent design.)  wouldn&#8217;t a plant with its ability to die back in winter be compared?  There have been seeds that have been germinated that were sitting in a museum for 100 years.  seeds don&#8217;t have to be given life by a creator.  once H2O reaches the embreyo inside a chemical reaction occurs and a seed is revitalized.  if any of that isn&#8217;t adaption than define adaption for me one more time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Plants that defy evolution:  Datura stramonium (Jimson Weed) by Dom</title>
		<link>http://idexposed.wordpress.com/2008/05/11/plants-that-defy-evolution-datura-stramonium-jimson-weed/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>Dom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 10:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idexposed.wordpress.com/?p=28#comment-176</guid>
		<description>wow. lol.   I read the first paragraph and skipped the rest.  what complete garbage.  it reminds me of my little brother who, in arguing his case proves the point for the other person.  The throns are a first line of defense.  the animal doesn&#039;t know the seeds are poisonous hence the menacing appearance of thorns as a warning.  the thorns could also be benificial in the fact they can latch onto an animal.  as a matter of fact a common trait in poisonous plants is purple veins in the leaf.(Datura Metel.)  unnatural color is usualy a defense to show that what the predator is seeing is alien and strange making it not want to find out what will happen if it eats it.  Poison Dart frogs are undeniable proof.  Seeing as the poison in a dart frog is not created by the frog itself (or any higher power for that matter)  it is created by the poisonous mites and various bugs it eats.  the poison is secreted out of the pores of its skin so it would have to have evolved those vibrant colors as a warning over time.  

  the thing is is that even plants share common chromosomes with humans.  and if an intelligent designer did create life than why would he create them in such a way that the simplest of lifeforms lead up to the most complex.  almost as if they evolved.  one of our biggest assets as human beings is our brains ability to recognize patterns.  all evolution is is a recognition of a pattern amongst all life.  so what have we done wrong? all we are doing is trying to make a hypothesis based on the patterns we see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow. lol.   I read the first paragraph and skipped the rest.  what complete garbage.  it reminds me of my little brother who, in arguing his case proves the point for the other person.  The throns are a first line of defense.  the animal doesn&#8217;t know the seeds are poisonous hence the menacing appearance of thorns as a warning.  the thorns could also be benificial in the fact they can latch onto an animal.  as a matter of fact a common trait in poisonous plants is purple veins in the leaf.(Datura Metel.)  unnatural color is usualy a defense to show that what the predator is seeing is alien and strange making it not want to find out what will happen if it eats it.  Poison Dart frogs are undeniable proof.  Seeing as the poison in a dart frog is not created by the frog itself (or any higher power for that matter)  it is created by the poisonous mites and various bugs it eats.  the poison is secreted out of the pores of its skin so it would have to have evolved those vibrant colors as a warning over time.  </p>
<p>  the thing is is that even plants share common chromosomes with humans.  and if an intelligent designer did create life than why would he create them in such a way that the simplest of lifeforms lead up to the most complex.  almost as if they evolved.  one of our biggest assets as human beings is our brains ability to recognize patterns.  all evolution is is a recognition of a pattern amongst all life.  so what have we done wrong? all we are doing is trying to make a hypothesis based on the patterns we see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Office of Special Counsel raided by PefqueerieShum</title>
		<link>http://idexposed.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/office-of-special-counsel-raided/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>PefqueerieShum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 10:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idexposed.wordpress.com/?p=13#comment-175</guid>
		<description>Very nice!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
